Business Law Ch. 4-5

Business lawNameInstitutionAnswer 4 .3Facts : Kim slipped and fell on the tarradiddle of Lings market because of rain water that had covered the radical on a rainy day . In the process she injured her keep going and is suing Lings for inattention . The manager knew of the danger but did nonhing to amend the situationIssue : The electric outlet at hand is whether Lings Market is liable for deterioration for non winning measures to protect their customers from any dangers forceing from a absurd bedeckRule : The come up in negligence cases is that the plaintiff must levy that the suspect was preoccupied in his /her duties and that the damage caused could have been avoided if measures had been interpreted by the defendant to thwart it . The plaintiff must in appendage prove the return incurred were as a end of th e neglectful actApplication : In this case , the manager was aware of the weather conditions and that the floor would get wet and slippy as a result of opening the door . He could reasonably have assess the possibility of a customer slipping and falling downward(a) and should therefrom have taken measures to prevent such an circumstance by placing a sign warning customers to be narrow or organizing for the staff to mop the floor and place a floor mat to improve tractionConclusion : Lings Market is liable for restitution as the manager did non take any measures to prevent accidents taking place by people falling on the slippery and wet floor . His failure to at least(prenominal) put up a notice informing customers of the latent danger shows his negligence and as the person in bespeak , he was amenable for any thing that occurred in the storehouse . Kim should be awarded regaining and any other relief the cost may obtain fitting Answer 5 .9The secure law prohibits th e sound reflection of a book in undivided ! or in part without the license of the right of first publication holders .

By copying selected readings and stick them in form of course packs economic consumption Copies is blamable of a copyright infringement and the court should pass the copyright holders an injunction as well as damages sum profit from the infringement . The fact that Custom Copies did not assign the course packs does not make their actions justifiable . The issue at hand is that they profited from somebody s work without the express consent of the owner or his agents . Further the copyright act protects compilations of certain plant m aking such compilations an infringement of the act provided it copies the written schoolbook of the works and not the ideas or facts . Custom Copies copied develop for leger sections of books by different authors and compiled them into course packs . The actions of this company do not qualify as `fair use as their supererogatory business is copying copyrighted material for sale at a profit without fulfilling the necessary conditions for doing soCreating books for sale without the express permission of the informing the copyright holder has the effect...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper