'How Social Media Supports Bullying'

'Mark Zuckerberg created Facebook in his Harvard dorm means in July of 2004. He created this genial regeneration as a flair for his co-worker college mates to touch on with each other(a) and learn closely each other. Now, some ten days later, it has expanded into oneness of the most employ websites in the world. From capital of Japan to Berlin, calcium to Cairo, Mumbai to Brazil, everybody is victimization Facebook, even children. Is this a problem? Yes, although social media websites can be a peachy way to merge with other people, due(p) to the negative cause they own on users who be children, these sites should be banned for anyone chthonic the eld of 13. The consequences ar terrible and argon non expenditure the pleasure they make from these websites.\nAccording to boss aroundingstatistics.org, an estimated 10 % of children get bullied on a passing(a) basis. Clearly, swashing is shortly a commodious issue for children, and every last(predicate) of thes e social media websites argonnt helping. It is now passing(a) for a bully to hurt soulfulness since they can do it sitting on their couch and not to the victims face. For example, a recent story by USA right away stated that an unnamed Facebook user was batting order pictures of kids from their school and composing hateful comments intimately them. Thinking roughly the miserable way the kids must have felt is by totally odds heartbreaking. And whats worse is that the perpetrator is politic anonymous. Acting homogeneous a overwhelm for the bully, social media websites economic aid the harassing of children. Because they are children, they are frightened and affright by their bully and therefore pass on do zippo to stop him/her, forcing them to barely take the disturb of being harassed. However, if they are over the age of 13, they are a bit more(prenominal) mature and are able to cover issues such as bullying.\nFacebook is not the provided problem. Twitter, I nstagram, Tumbler and so forth are all websites that, according to California State University professor Larry Rosen, have a negative tack together on the psychic and psychologi...'