Blindness and Sight - Lack of Vision in Oedipus the King :: King Lear essays

Parental Blindness in King Lear As Shakespeare presents to us a tragic pattern of maternal and filial lie with, in which a prosperous musical composition is devested of power and in the end recognises his folly, empathy is induced in the audience. In King Lear, it is noted from the descent of the play that two Lear and Gloucester suffer from self-approbation and will consequently find divine revelation by enduring the rack of this tough world. While Lear erroneously entrusts the shallow professions of love from his thankless daughters - Goneril and Regan - instead of the selfless words of Cordelia, Gloucester shadows a similar ignorance by initially entrusting love in the evil Edmund, quite an than Edgar, whom we consider to be a truly doglike noble gentlemen. Undeniably, both parents misjudge appearance for reality, as it is only in this way that they set up let the great gods that keep this dreadful pudder Oer their heads / Find expose their enemies where all vengeance c omes too short. When Lear is rejected by Goneril and Regan and barren of his hundred Knights and squires, he is left with nothing in the wilderness, besides the loyal company of Kent and the Fool, and later on, Edgar and Gloucester. It appears that at this stage he senses his folly, that he did Cordelia wrong. But Lear has yet to gain full insight. Although, before get in the hovel, he realises that he has been a man more sinned against sinning, the mathematical operation of self-discovery is not complete until all truth is unveiled. As Lear realises his foolishness in bannishing Cordelia - his joy and the only daughter who truly loves him - we sense Lears increasing gloominess and despair. By revealling his sin, he is subjecting himself to punishment. Perhaps it is a deserving motion, since he had passed judgement and punished Kent and Cordelia for coming between the dragon and his wrath, that is, him and his power. at once the gods above rightfully control Lears destiny, abidi ng by the process that man has to suffer to gain peace. At this particular moment, Lear is still unaware of Kents identity, mask as Caius, ever since he bannished Kent for defending Cordeilas thoughtful choice to love and be silent. We understand that the disguise is a way in which Kent can protect and continually serve the poor, weak and infirm Lear. Lear begins to extend to understanding through the change in his contemptuous behaviour to a sympathetic learning man.