Ethical Argument Choose a topic and argue the ethical side opposite of Essay

Ethical Argument Choose a topic and argue the ethical side opposite of the authoritative norm - Essay ExampleSuch could be the results of miscues especially of decisions, which are shadowed by the mists of pride and vested interests and the neglect of some ethical and moral guidelines. state of war had been a way of life for early civilizations. It was primarily the direct result of segmented societies where communities are tied by tribal concerns of control. The need for survival requires dominance within an area. To have a wider space means an assurance for much than resources more security for living. The evolution of societies from early nomads until the present is marred by a lot of small and big wars. We have two major world wars and separate big war yet to come, which doomsday seers predicted to cause an end to kind-heartedity. Therefore, whether we wish it or not, war is an accepted norm.But trends in war have changed from the way it was fought in prehistoric and olde n times. The rise of deep concern to human lives created awareness among the government leaders and ordinary persons alike the importance of preservation of life. War has become a form of arrogance and aggression. Wars fought today in the uniform cause, as thousand years ago is condemnable act. Today, war becomes a means of defense to suppress the interest of those who want to dominate a certain territory without respect for human rights. When the US led a campaign in Kuwait, it was meant to liberate a nation. When US challenge the North Koreans or other nations going into nuclear program, it was intended to warn them of the possible effects in future ambitions of arms development. Since the idea about war has shifted from barbaric acts of territorial grabbing to more of defensive acts the norm shifted to international recognition of human rights. Nations, great or small, share equal right and peoples of different races, colors, and territory show respect with nonpareil another. M any nations joined international organizations to recognize everyones rights. The 21st century is the turning request of history and witness to the shift from the savage war of the past to humanitarian concern of the present and the future. But the declaration of the war on terror after the 9/11 events caused a global war against enemies we dont know. The campaign has caused more casualties of innocent lives, arrests of innocent persons, and branding of several organizations who air grievances against their nations as terrorists. The war was indeed claimed to have been launched to secure the world against terrorists, but it has gone to a point that human rights were already compromised. But terrorism is a big issue and requires some moral judgment to qualify or consider certain acts as a form of terrorism. There are accepted definitions of terrorisms but interpretations differ. As Record stated The definitional mire that surrounds terrorism stems in large measure from differing pe rspectives on the moral relationship between objectives sought and means employed. It is easy for the politically satisfied and militarily powerful to pronounce all terrorism evil disregarding of circumstance, but, like it or not, those at the other end of the spectrum are bound to see things differently (8).As a result the War on apprehension created confusion among the young Americans, who were taught about the morals of war and peace. The moralist consider the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon not acts of war but as a species of natural disaster, requiring unstinting generosity towards the